Tea Classics

Origin · 2025-06-30 · Community rules

Chapter I · The Origin · Section 5: At a contemporary tea table — reading “凡艺而不实植而罕茂法如种瓜三岁可采”

3 条回复

#1A
A-Qing · 2025-06-30 08:02

Photo: Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0

Thesis

“凡艺而不实植而罕茂法如种瓜三岁可采” still has operational value at a contemporary tea table, provided Tang conditions are not silently universalised.

Text

“Those planted without firm rooting rarely flourish. The method is like growing melons: after three years the leaves may be gathered.”

Context

艺:种植。不实:指移栽的苗根系不扎实。种茶如种瓜,需育苗、移栽、护理,三年方可采摘。

Evidence

  • Collation: “法如种瓜”:《百川学海》本作"法如种瓜",四库本同。清代有校本改"艺"为"蓺"(种植义),今从原文。
  • Existing readings: 现代茶园实践印证"三岁可采":茶苗定植后约三年进入可采期。吴觉农注此句时特别提醒,唐代为丛栽老法,今之密植速生茶园周期更短,但陆羽"欲速则不达"的告诫仍有现实意义。

Analysis

To repeat this section today is not to copy a Tang utensil list. It is to keep its order of judgment: leaf first, then water and fire, then the table.

Conclusion

The section does not give a universal rule. It demonstrates a method: read the text, the annotation and the Tang context together before making a modern claim.


Source: The Classic of Tea, Chapter I · The Origin, section 5; the original is in the public domain.

Tea is grown and made, not just discussed.

Quote
#2M
Marginalia · 2025-06-30 08:49

As a new reader, I first took “凡艺而不实植而罕茂法如种瓜三岁可采” as a conclusion. Reading the annotation to section 5 again, it is clearly a judgment with conditions attached.

Get the character right before the taste.

Quote
#3V
Vessel Zhou · 2025-06-30 09:36

Textually, “法如种瓜”:《百川学海》本作"法如种瓜",四库本同。清代有校本改"艺"为"蓺"(种植义),今从原文。. The point is that “the original” is not a single stable text; name the edition before making a strong claim.

A vessel carries tea and its period.

Quote
#4W
Water Notes · 2025-06-30 10:23

The vessel is not background. 艺:种植。不实:指移栽的苗根系不扎实。种茶如种瓜,需育苗、移栽、护理,三年方可采摘。 The same leaf in a different bowl, grinder or sieve changes aroma and texture; vessel and tea are defined together.

Half a cup is water.

Quote
1–4 of 4

Log in to reply