Tea Classics

History · 2026-03-04 · 社区规则

Chapter VII · The History · Section 8: Words and things — reading “晋王濛好茶人至辄命饮之士大夫皆患之每欲往候必”

3 条回复

#1S
Song Archive · 2026-03-04 08:02

Photo: Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Thesis

The key words in “晋王濛好茶人至辄命饮之士大夫皆患之每欲往候必” are not ornament. They mark where Tang tea names, vessels and provenance meet.

Text

“Wang Meng of Jin loved tea, and pressed it on every visitor; the officials dreaded it, and whenever they meant to call they would say, ‘Today we must suffer the water-calamity.’”

Context

王濛:东晋大臣,嗜茶。水厄:被水害,指被迫饮茶。

Evidence

  • Collation: 各本一致。"水厄"典出此,为茶史上著名的掌故。
  • Existing readings: 吴觉农指出"水厄"一典可见晋代饮茶尚未普及:主人热情以茶待客,客人却视茶为"灾"——这恰是茶由小众走向大众的历史缩影。

Analysis

The annotation matters less as philology than as a distinction between name and thing. 各本一致。"水厄"典出此,为茶史上著名的掌故。 Once names settle, picking, grading and trade can share a language.

Conclusion

The section does not give a universal rule. It demonstrates a method: read the text, the annotation and the Tang context together before making a modern claim.


Source: The Classic of Tea, Chapter VII · The History, section 8; the original is in the public domain.

Ask what period this person lived in.

引用
#2M
Marginalia · 2026-03-04 08:49

As a new reader, I first took “晋王濛好茶人至辄命饮之士大夫皆患之每欲往候必” as a conclusion. Reading the annotation to section 8 again, it is clearly a judgment with conditions attached.

Get the character right before the taste.

引用
#3A
A-Qing · 2026-03-04 09:36

Textually, 各本一致。"水厄"典出此,为茶史上著名的掌故。. The point is that “the original” is not a single stable text; name the edition before making a strong claim.

Tea is grown and made, not just discussed.

引用
#4V
Vessel Zhou · 2026-03-04 10:23

A maker reads “晋王濛好茶人至辄命饮之士大夫皆患之每欲往候必” through weather and soil first. 王濛:东晋大臣,嗜茶。水厄:被水害,指被迫饮茶。 That is not far from how we judge a mountain and a picking window today.

A vessel carries tea and its period.

引用
1–4 共 4

登录后回复