
Photo: Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
Thesis
The key words in “穿江东淮南剖竹为之巴山峡川纫榖皮为之江东以一” are not ornament. They mark where Tang tea names, vessels and provenance meet.
Text
“The chuan string is made in Jiangdong and Huainan from split bamboo, and in Bashan and the gorges from twisted mulberry-bark. In Jiangdong one jin is a large string, half a jin a medium, and four or five liang a small one.”
Context
穿:把茶饼串起来的绳子。江东、淮南用剖开的竹皮;巴山峡川用榖(gǔ)树皮搓成。江东以一斤为一穿上,半斤为中穿,四五两为小穿。
Evidence
- Collation: "纫榖皮"各本一致,榖(构)树皮纤维坚韧可制绳。吴觉农注:此句详记唐代茶饼称重与包装规格。
- Existing readings: 吴觉农据"穿"之规格指出:唐代饼茶已标准化——一斤/半斤/四五两三档,便于运输与交易,是早期"茶叶商品化"的实物证据。
Analysis
The annotation matters less as philology than as a distinction between name and thing. "纫榖皮"各本一致,榖(构)树皮纤维坚韧可制绳。吴觉农注:此句详记唐代茶饼称重与包装规格。 Once names settle, picking, grading and trade can share a language.
Conclusion
The section does not give a universal rule. It demonstrates a method: read the text, the annotation and the Tang context together before making a modern claim.
Source: The Classic of Tea, Chapter II · The Implements, section 10; the original is in the public domain.
Ask what period this person lived in.