
Photo: Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0
Thesis
Section 6 is not really about “黔中生恩州播州费州夷州往往得之其味极佳”; it is about how Lu Yu turns tea from a local product into an object of argument.
Text
“In Qianzhong, teas of Enzhou, Bozhou, Feizhou, and Yizhou are only occasionally obtained, yet their flavor is excellent.”
Context
黔中:今贵州一带。恩州、播州、费州、夷州:皆为唐代黔中道属州。往往得之:偶尔得到。
Evidence
- Collation: 各本一致。吴觉农注:黔中即今贵州,"往往得之"说明唐代贵州茶尚未成规模,但陆羽已识其味佳。
- Existing readings: 吴觉农指出陆羽一句"其味极佳"为贵州茶写下最早的赞语——千余年后,都匀毛尖等贵州名茶印证了这片土地出好茶的潜质。
Analysis
Formally, the section gives a judgment, adds material detail, then returns to human practice. 黔中:今贵州一带。恩州、播州、费州、夷州:皆为唐代黔中道属州。往往得之:偶尔得到。 That is why the Classic of Tea reads as an argued book rather than a miscellany.
Conclusion
The section does not give a universal rule. It demonstrates a method: read the text, the annotation and the Tang context together before making a modern claim.
Source: The Classic of Tea, Chapter VIII · The Producing Regions, section 6; the original is in the public domain.
Get the character right before the taste.